Peacock v SoS Environment
Language: English Series: Property and Compensation Reports ; (1995) 69 P&CR 388-393(3)Publication details: 1995Subject(s): Summary: CA 14 June 1994. P appealed against refusal of planning permission for retention of a large poultry house. Use of the land for agriculture did not need planning permission as it did not constitute development under Town and Country Planning Act 1990. Under the General Development Order P could erect an agricultural building under sch 2 part 6 Class A, but this was excluded as the building would be within 25m of a classified road. P appealed against the decision. Appeal dismissed.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | ABS52939 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 992-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
CA 14 June 1994. P appealed against refusal of planning permission for retention of a large poultry house. Use of the land for agriculture did not need planning permission as it did not constitute development under Town and Country Planning Act 1990. Under the General Development Order P could erect an agricultural building under sch 2 part 6 Class A, but this was excluded as the building would be within 25m of a classified road. P appealed against the decision. Appeal dismissed.