Handling nuisance claims: the duty to abate a hazard
Language: English Series: Solicitors` Journal ; 142(30) 31 July 1998, 720-721(2)Publication details: 1998Subject(s):- BARKER V HERBERT
- BRADBURN V LINDSAY
- BRS V SLATER
- CAMBRIDGE WATER CO LTD V EASTERN COUNTIES LEATHER PLC (CA)
- GILES V WALKER
- GOLDMAN V HARGRAVE
- HAZARDS
- HUNTER V CANARY WHARF
- HUSSAIN V LANCASTER CC
- JOB EDWARDS V BIRMINGHAM NAVIGATIONS
- LANDOWNERS
- NEGLIGENCE
- PAGE MOTORS V EPSOM AND EWELL BC
- PHYSICAL DAMAGE
- PONTARDAWE RC V MOORE-GWYN
- PRIVATE NUISANCE
- RADSTOCK CO-OPERATIVE V NORTON-RADSTOCK
- RYLANDS V FLETCHER
- SAINT V JENNER
- SEDLEIGH-DENFIELD V O'CALLAGHAN
- SMITH V LITTLEWOODS ORGANISATION LTD
- SPARKE V OSBORNE
- TATE AND LYLE INDUSTRIES V GREATER LONDON COUNCIL
- PROPERTY LAW AND PRACTICE
| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal article | London Journal article | ABS59222 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 87916-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
Rejects a suggestion that it is time to call a halt to the law of private nuisance by physical damage and to subsume all such cases into the law of negligence. Since the law of private nuisance is a robust tort with significant practical advantages to the plaintiff and it is important in understanding the relationship between nuisance and negligence.