Image from Google Jackets

Jones and others v Greater Manchester Passenger Transport Executive

Language: English Series: Estates Gazette ; [1998] 36 EG 150-154(5) (5/09/98)Publication details: 1998Subject(s): Summary: "Jones and others v Greater Manchester Passenger Transport Executive" LT 4 March 1998. The claimant trustees held a lease with an unexpired term of 1,000 years. The 1991 and 1993 unitary development plans contained a policy for the extension of the Manchester metrolink system. In 1995 the claimants served a blight notice. The respondent served a counternotice under the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 s151(4)(a) to the effect that no part of the hereditament was blighted land. In 1996 the respondent gave notice under Transport and Works Act 1992 that it was applying for an order authorising the compulsory purchase of , inter alia, the property. The claimants referred the blight notice and the counternotice to the LT. Whether property `allocated` or `indicated` for transport purposes. The objection to the blight notice was upheld. The objection to the blight notice was upheld. The property was not mentioned in draft unitary development plan.
Holdings
Item type Current library Call number Copy number Status Barcode
Law report London Journal article ABS59284 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) 1 Available 88810-1001

"Jones and others v Greater Manchester Passenger Transport Executive" LT 4 March 1998. The claimant trustees held a lease with an unexpired term of 1,000 years. The 1991 and 1993 unitary development plans contained a policy for the extension of the Manchester metrolink system. In 1995 the claimants served a blight notice. The respondent served a counternotice under the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 s151(4)(a) to the effect that no part of the hereditament was blighted land. In 1996 the respondent gave notice under Transport and Works Act 1992 that it was applying for an order authorising the compulsory purchase of , inter alia, the property. The claimants referred the blight notice and the counternotice to the LT. Whether property `allocated` or `indicated` for transport purposes. The objection to the blight notice was upheld. The objection to the blight notice was upheld. The property was not mentioned in draft unitary development plan.