Sullivan v Layton Lougher & Co
Language: English Series: Estates Gazette ; (1995) 49 EG 127-128(2)Publication details: 1995Subject(s): Summary: CA 28 February 1995. The plaintiff purchased the unexpired 63-year term of leasehold premises. The plaintiff alleged the defendant solicitors did not advise him that the lease had been extended under the Leasehold Reform Act 1967, allowing no further extension under that act. The plaintiff`s appeal against the decision that this claim was statute-barred, was dismissed.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | ABS54219 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 9083-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
CA 28 February 1995. The plaintiff purchased the unexpired 63-year term of leasehold premises. The plaintiff alleged the defendant solicitors did not advise him that the lease had been extended under the Leasehold Reform Act 1967, allowing no further extension under that act. The plaintiff`s appeal against the decision that this claim was statute-barred, was dismissed.