Notice to break
Series: Estates Gazette Case Summaries ; [1999] EGCS 144 (1)Publication details: 1999Subject(s): Summary: Havant International Holdings Ltd v Lionsgate (H) Investment Ltd. ChD 30 November 1999. The claimant tenant (HIHL) served two break notices signed by the director of a subsidiary company, Havant International Ltd. The landlord claimed that the notices were invalid because they had not been signed by or on behalf of HIHL . "Held" the notices were valid.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| News article | London News article | X103261 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 103261-1001 |
Havant International Holdings Ltd v Lionsgate (H) Investment Ltd. ChD 30 November 1999. The claimant tenant (HIHL) served two break notices signed by the director of a subsidiary company, Havant International Ltd. The landlord claimed that the notices were invalid because they had not been signed by or on behalf of HIHL . "Held" the notices were valid.