Danger - slippery law
Series: Building ; 265(8136) 12 May 2000, 62-63(2)Publication details: 2000Subject(s):- MANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION-ADJUDICATION
- BLOOR CONSTRUCTION V BOWMER AND KIRKLAND
- BOUYGUES UK LTD V DAHL-JENSEN UK LTD
- FW COOK V SHIMIZU
- HOUSING GRANTS, CONSTRUCTION AND REGENERATION ACT 1996
- HOUSING GRANTS CONSTRUCTION AND REGENERATION ACT 1996
- SLIP RULE
- Dispute resolution
| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal article | London Journal article | ABS62317 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 106293-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
Discusses Judge Toulmin's decision in "Bloor Construction v Bowmer & Kirkland", how this illustrates the implied 'slip' rule in adjudication, and the gaps it reveals in the current Construction Act.