Riordan Communications Ltd v South Bucks DC
Series: Journal of Planning and Environment Law ; [2000] JPL June 2000, 594-604(11)Publication details: 2000Subject(s): Summary: QBD 2 December 1999. The claimants R were granted planning permission for a development subject to a time limit of five years. The plans were commenced within the deadline, but then came to a halt and did not resume until four years later. The work stopped again and SB claimed that the orginal planning permission had lapsed because R lacked the genuine intention of carrying out the development. Held, claim allowed.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | ABS62521 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 106649-1001 |
QBD 2 December 1999. The claimants R were granted planning permission for a development subject to a time limit of five years. The plans were commenced within the deadline, but then came to a halt and did not resume until four years later. The work stopped again and SB claimed that the orginal planning permission had lapsed because R lacked the genuine intention of carrying out the development. Held, claim allowed.