Back to Latham
Series: Building ; (27) 7 July 2000, 73(1)Publication details: 2000Subject(s): Summary: Argues that adjudication is failing one of its key criteria of improving site relations. Suggests that this is because the present adjudication process does not follow all the recommendations, for resolving potential conflicts, of the Latham report. For example pre-pricing variations agreed by both parties as to cost and programme implications.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal article | London Journal article | ABS62604 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 107610-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
Argues that adjudication is failing one of its key criteria of improving site relations. Suggests that this is because the present adjudication process does not follow all the recommendations, for resolving potential conflicts, of the Latham report. For example pre-pricing variations agreed by both parties as to cost and programme implications.