Image from Google Jackets

Designed out of the picture

By: Contributor(s): Series: Building ; 265(8149) 11 August 2000, 53(1)Publication details: 2000Subject(s): Summary: Discusses the case of "Co-operative Retail Services v Taylor Young Partnership" which upheld the original intent behind the JCT insurance provisions. The decision that the JCT Contract provided a code to ensure fire damage should be reinstated and the consequences of delay apportioned could cause a major transfer of risk from joint names to professional indemnity insurers.

Discusses the case of "Co-operative Retail Services v Taylor Young Partnership" which upheld the original intent behind the JCT insurance provisions. The decision that the JCT Contract provided a code to ensure fire damage should be reinstated and the consequences of delay apportioned could cause a major transfer of risk from joint names to professional indemnity insurers.