Hillingdon LBC v ARC Limited
Series: Rating and Valuation Reporter ; 40(9) [2000] RVR 283-292(10)Publication details: 2000Subject(s): Summary: CA 16 June 2000. ARC Limited (A) claimed compensation following the compulsory acquisition by the council (C) of land occupied by them. A submitted its original claim in April 1982, but no reference to the LT was made until September 1995. C took the point that the proceedings were statute barred as a result of the Limitation Act 1980 s9. In April 1999 a judge held that C was precluded by convention estoppel from relying on the limitation point. C appealed. Appeal allowed on the grounds that there was no estoppel preventing C from relying on the limitation defence.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | ABS62992 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 108916-1001 |
CA 16 June 2000. ARC Limited (A) claimed compensation following the compulsory acquisition by the council (C) of land occupied by them. A submitted its original claim in April 1982, but no reference to the LT was made until September 1995. C took the point that the proceedings were statute barred as a result of the Limitation Act 1980 s9. In April 1999 a judge held that C was precluded by convention estoppel from relying on the limitation point. C appealed. Appeal allowed on the grounds that there was no estoppel preventing C from relying on the limitation defence.