Rent review system in chaos
Language: English Series: Property Week ; 49(8) 24 November 1994, 9(1)Publication details: 1994Subject(s): Summary: In three decisions in the CA, "Middleton Potts & Co v Scottish Amicable Life Assurance Society", "National Westminster Bank v Co-Operative Wholesale Society" and ""Greenham Trading v Prudential Nominess", judges ruled that rent-free periods should be taken into account when setting a rent at review. However in a fouth case "Lehman Brothers v Broadgate Square" it was held that a rent-free period should not be taken into account.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| News article | London News article | WB3044-49 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 10412-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: News article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
In three decisions in the CA, "Middleton Potts & Co v Scottish Amicable Life Assurance Society", "National Westminster Bank v Co-Operative Wholesale Society" and ""Greenham Trading v Prudential Nominess", judges ruled that rent-free periods should be taken into account when setting a rent at review. However in a fouth case "Lehman Brothers v Broadgate Square" it was held that a rent-free period should not be taken into account.