Residential development
Series: Estates Gazette Case Summaries ; [2001] EGCS 14(1) (10/02/01)Publication details: 2001Subject(s): Summary: QBD 24 January 2001. St James Homes (S) applied for planning permission but the site was actually found to be within the green belt after S appealed against the council's non-determination of application. SOS dismissed the appeal and refused planning permission. S held that the SOS had failed to consider relevant policies in the development plan. Claim allowed.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| News article | London News article | WB3707-25 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 110946-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: News article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
| No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | ||
| WB3707-22 Fair rent | WB3707-23 RDA special report | WB3707-24 French coal mining | WB3707-25 Residential development | WB3707-26 Scheme to boost inner city areas | WB3707-27 £5m to boost communities | WB3707-28 Greener ways to improve income |
QBD 24 January 2001. St James Homes (S) applied for planning permission but the site was actually found to be within the green belt after S appealed against the council's non-determination of application. SOS dismissed the appeal and refused planning permission. S held that the SOS had failed to consider relevant policies in the development plan. Claim allowed.