Repairing covenants
Series: Estates Gazette Case Summaries ; [2001] EGCS 13(1) (10/02/01)Publication details: 2001Subject(s): Summary: CA 19 January 2001. The tenants (P) of a building with flying box balconies, felt that the landlord (PP)had breached the repairing covenant by not keeping the roof terraces repaired. PP held that P had agreed in the leases to repair and maintain the flat, walls and ceilings including where the balconies were part of these. The judge held that the obligations of both parties overlapped in the terms of the lease; the landlord appealed. Appeal allowed| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| News article | London News article | WB3707-21 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 110951-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: News article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
| No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | ||
| WB3707-18 Fife offers new-build protection | WB3707-19 Rural IT boost | WB3707-20 Analysts' model to break barriers | WB3707-21 Repairing covenants | WB3707-22 Fair rent | WB3707-23 RDA special report | WB3707-24 French coal mining |
CA 19 January 2001. The tenants (P) of a building with flying box balconies, felt that the landlord (PP)had breached the repairing covenant by not keeping the roof terraces repaired. PP held that P had agreed in the leases to repair and maintain the flat, walls and ceilings including where the balconies were part of these. The judge held that the obligations of both parties overlapped in the terms of the lease; the landlord appealed. Appeal allowed