Are evaluators asking the right questions?
Series: Regeneration and Renewal ; 9 February 2001, 16-17(2)Publication details: 2001Subject(s): Summary: Reports that the assessment of a regeneration scheme should be a positive process which can underscore the effectiveness of a project and contribute to renewal objectives. Warns against evaluators wrongly evaluating a project, which can lead to misdirection of funds, and lost impact of the initiative. Looks at the two traditional approaches to evaluation: quantitative and qualitative, and also discusses new directions the evaluation process may take.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal article | London Journal article | ABS63605 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 111114-1001 |
Reports that the assessment of a regeneration scheme should be a positive process which can underscore the effectiveness of a project and contribute to renewal objectives. Warns against evaluators wrongly evaluating a project, which can lead to misdirection of funds, and lost impact of the initiative. Looks at the two traditional approaches to evaluation: quantitative and qualitative, and also discusses new directions the evaluation process may take.