Scammell and others v Dicker
Series: Weekly Law Reports ; [2001]1 WLR 631-638(8)Publication details: 2001Subject(s): Summary: CA 21 December 2001. The parties attempted to settle a boundary dispute before the trial. The defendant D made an offer to settle the dispute under CPR Pt 36 by letter on 9 March 2000 but withdrew the offer by letter dated 13 March. The offer was expressed to be open for 21 days. The CC held that D was not entitled to withdraw the Part 36 offer unillaterally . CC ruling overturned. CA held that D was entiled to withdraw. Appeal allowed.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | ABS63793 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 112472-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
CA 21 December 2001. The parties attempted to settle a boundary dispute before the trial. The defendant D made an offer to settle the dispute under CPR Pt 36 by letter on 9 March 2000 but withdrew the offer by letter dated 13 March. The offer was expressed to be open for 21 days. The CC held that D was not entitled to withdraw the Part 36 offer unillaterally . CC ruling overturned. CA held that D was entiled to withdraw. Appeal allowed.