Landlord and Tenant
Series: Estates Gazette ; [2001] 29 EG 119 (CS)Publication details: 2001Subject(s): Summary: "Arogol Co Ltd v Rajah" CA 21 March 2001. Defendant (R) claimed he was a protected tenant under of the Housing Act 1988 s34(1)(b)and by the Rent Act 1977 in proceedings issued against him by (A) because of rent arrears. Judge found that R had been a protected tenant but that no longer applied. R appealed and the appeal was allowed. Concluded that R was a protected tenant under Rent Act 1977.| Item type | Current library | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | 1 | Available | 113783-1001 |
"Arogol Co Ltd v Rajah" CA 21 March 2001. Defendant (R) claimed he was a protected tenant under of the Housing Act 1988 s34(1)(b)and by the Rent Act 1977 in proceedings issued against him by (A) because of rent arrears. Judge found that R had been a protected tenant but that no longer applied. R appealed and the appeal was allowed. Concluded that R was a protected tenant under Rent Act 1977.