Cut us some slack
Series: Building ; 266(8193) 13 July 2001, 54(1)Publication details: 2001Subject(s):- TIME LIMITS
- MANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION-ADJUDICATION-ADJUDICATORS
- MANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION-ADJUDICATION
- JOHN MOWLEM CONSTRUCTION PLC V SOS DEFENCE
- HOUSING GRANTS, CONSTRUCTION AND REGENERATION ACT 1996
- BUILT ENVIRONMENT-BUILDING CONTRACT FORMS
- CONTRACTORS
- Dispute resolution
| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal article | London Journal article | ABS64259 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 113971-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
Notes that adjudication is increasingly required to deal with complicated matters that are difficult to resolve within 28 days. Suggests that it would make for a fairer process if adjudicators were given the right to extend the time limit. With reference to the recent case of "John Mowlem Construction plc v SoS for Defence" (2000).