Nothing but the truth

Series: Estates Gazette ; (0131) 4 August 2001, 99(1)Publication details: 2001Subject(s):

Summary: Considers the decision in "Banks v Cox" which highlights the distinction between caveat emptor and misrepresentation. The defendants were found guilty of fraud because they did not respond honestly to a conveyancing enquiry regarding the financial viability of their business.

Holdings ( 1 )
Title notes ( 1 )

Holdings
Item type	Current library	Call number	Copy number	Status	Barcode
News article	London News article	WB3731-36 (Browse shelf(Opens below))	1	Available	114044-1001

Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: News article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)

Previous	No cover image available	No cover image available	No cover image available	No cover image available	No cover image available	No cover image available	No cover image available	Next
Previous	WB3731-33 Upward and downward rent reviews	WB3731-34 Landlord and tenant: rent review	WB3731-35 Agent tore down rival 'For Sale' sign	WB3731-36 Nothing but the truth	WB3731-37 Importance of auction information	WB3731-38 Online conveyancing service	WB3731-39 New timetables for business rates appeals	Next

Considers the decision in "Banks v Cox" which highlights the distinction between caveat emptor and misrepresentation. The defendants were found guilty of fraud because they did not respond honestly to a conveyancing enquiry regarding the financial viability of their business.

Print
Cite
Send to device
Save record
BIBTEX Dublin Core MARCXML MARC (non-Unicode/MARC-8) MARC (Unicode/UTF-8) MARC (Unicode/UTF-8, Standard) MODS (XML) RIS ISBD
More searches

Search for this title in:
Other Libraries (WorldCat) Other Databases (Google Scholar) Open Library (openlibrary.org)