Name borrowing arbitration
Series: Contract Journal ; 410(6345) 19 September 2001, 23(1)Publication details: 2001Subject(s):- BELGRAVIA PROPERTY CO LTD V S&R (LONDON) LTD AND TAYLOR WOODROW MANAGEMENT LTD
- MANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ARBITRATION
- NAME BORROWING
- JCT MANAGEMENT CONTRACT
- MANAGEMENT CONTRACTORS
- ARCHITECTS
- MANGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION
| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal article | London Journal article | ABS64528 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 114852-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
Discusses "Belgravia Property Company Ltd v S & R (London) Ltd and Taylor Woodrow Management Ltd". This highlights the mechanisms for works contractors' name-borrowing arbitrations with the employer under JCT Management Forms of Contract. Examines clauses 4.27 and 1.11. The implication of the judge's ruling, in this case, is that an aggrieved works contractor should only proceed in an arbitration against the employer to recover disputed monies if he has first complied with the requirements of clause 1.11, and informed the management contractor of his intentions. Full copy of judgment available at: http://porch.ccta.gov.uk/courtser/judgements.nsf/Search/4D7B3A696F20153F80256A9200541626?OpenDocument