Something rotten
Series: Building ; 266(8204) 5 October 2001, 58(1)Publication details: 2001Subject(s): Summary: Argues that the payment provisions introduced by the Construction Act 1996 are confusing to practictoners. Points a number of discrepancies regarding payment in construction contracts such as the 'due date for payment', the mandatory notice, the 'withholding notice', the idea of a 'final date for payment', and the supposedly strict regime for payments. Concludes that the current payment arrangements must be revised so practioners know what they are doing.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal article | London Journal article | ABS64622 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 115336-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
Argues that the payment provisions introduced by the Construction Act 1996 are confusing to practictoners. Points a number of discrepancies regarding payment in construction contracts such as the 'due date for payment', the mandatory notice, the 'withholding notice', the idea of a 'final date for payment', and the supposedly strict regime for payments. Concludes that the current payment arrangements must be revised so practioners know what they are doing.