Development disagreement
Series: Estates Gazette ; (0144) 3 November 2001, (1)Publication details: 2001Subject(s): Summary: Second part of a discussion of "Liverpool City Council v Walton Group" - a wide-ranging dispute over the development agreement relating to a site in the centre of Liverpool (for part 1 see: WB3741-17). Among the key points drawn from the ruling are that: while a court will not imply a general obligation to co-operate, it can require a contracting party to facilitate specific aspects of a contract. Secondly, in this agreement there was an implied obligation to act reasonably when deciding whether to allow the development agreement to proceed to its next stage.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| News article | London News article | WB3742-11 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 115513-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: News article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
Second part of a discussion of "Liverpool City Council v Walton Group" - a wide-ranging dispute over the development agreement relating to a site in the centre of Liverpool (for part 1 see: WB3741-17). Among the key points drawn from the ruling are that: while a court will not imply a general obligation to co-operate, it can require a contracting party to facilitate specific aspects of a contract. Secondly, in this agreement there was an implied obligation to act reasonably when deciding whether to allow the development agreement to proceed to its next stage.