Geoff Brewer of Brewer Consulting considers challenges to adjudication
Series: Contract Journal ; 410(6348) 10 October 2001, 33(1)Publication details: 2001Subject(s):- MANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION-ADJUDICATION
- HOUSING GRANTS CONSTRUCTION AND REGENERATION ACT 1996
- BAR V LAW MINING
- KNS INDUSTRIAL SERVICES (BIRMINGHAM) V SINDALL
- FAREBROTHER BUILDING SERVICES V FROGMORE INVESTMENTS LTD
- MANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION-ADJUDICATION-ADJUDICATORS
- JURISDICTION
- Dispute resolution
| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal article | London Journal article | ABS64787 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 115710-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
Compares how the Scottish and English courts have differed in their interpretation of the "Housing Grants, Construction and Regeneration Act 1996" in a few areas. One area of interpretation is whether, following an application for enforcement of an adjudicator's decision, the court would be willing to enforce part of a decision if it seemed sound, and refuse enforcement of the remaining part if a successful challenge had been made. Looks at the different approaches north and south of the border with reference to case law.