Landlord and tenant: brewery tie
Series: Estates Gazette Case Summaries ; [2002] 06 EG 154 (CS) (9/02/02)Publication details: 2002Subject(s): Summary: CA 31 January 2002. "Plummer v TIBSCO Ltd". Respondent P was the tenant of a public house under a five-year lease that contained tie provisions. Clause 26 of the lease gave P the option to renew the lease if tie provisions were fulfilled. Later P and the appellant landlord T agreed the tie provisions had become unlawful. P exercised the option to renew the lease. T refused renewal on the grounds that the tie provisions had not been fulfilled. P agreed to take a lease on different terms and subsequently brought a successful claim for damages for breach of contract. T appealed. Appeal allowed: by accepting the 20-year term P compromised his claim to a five-year lease and his claim for damages for breach of contract.| Item type | Current library | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London News article | 1 | Available | 116702-1001 |
CA 31 January 2002. "Plummer v TIBSCO Ltd". Respondent P was the tenant of a public house under a five-year lease that contained tie provisions. Clause 26 of the lease gave P the option to renew the lease if tie provisions were fulfilled. Later P and the appellant landlord T agreed the tie provisions had become unlawful. P exercised the option to renew the lease. T refused renewal on the grounds that the tie provisions had not been fulfilled. P agreed to take a lease on different terms and subsequently brought a successful claim for damages for breach of contract. T appealed. Appeal allowed: by accepting the 20-year term P compromised his claim to a five-year lease and his claim for damages for breach of contract.