A and T F Bennett v North West Water
Language: English Series: Rating & Valuation Reporter ; (1996) RVR 36(2), 30-35Publication details: 1996Subject(s): Summary: LT 14 August 1995. B claimed compensation for depreciation of freehold value after N laid a larger sewer to replace an existing one. B`s claim was based on a reduced offer on purchase of the land by a developer after they realised `disruption and loss of plots caused by the drainage scheme through the site`, and that a further area of the land was undevelopable. "Held" claim dismissed as B failed to establish depreciation in value of their interest due to the new sewer.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | ABS54521 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 10947-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
LT 14 August 1995. B claimed compensation for depreciation of freehold value after N laid a larger sewer to replace an existing one. B`s claim was based on a reduced offer on purchase of the land by a developer after they realised `disruption and loss of plots caused by the drainage scheme through the site`, and that a further area of the land was undevelopable. "Held" claim dismissed as B failed to establish depreciation in value of their interest due to the new sewer.