Possession order
Series: Estates Gazette ; [2002] 10 EG 156(CS) (09/03/02)Publication details: 2002Subject(s): Summary: "Bath and North East Somerset DC v Nicholson" ChD 22 February 2002. The claimant council B commenced possession proceedings against respondent N after many years of adverse possession. N, resisting the application on the grounds that he claimed adverse possesion, argued that the claim was time-barred under Limitation Act 1980 s15 and Sched 1 and that the 'without prejudice' letter of 1988 proposing lease terms was inadmissible. Held that B was entitled to possession as N had failed to prove adverse possession.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London News article | WB3810-24 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 117116-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: News article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
"Bath and North East Somerset DC v Nicholson" ChD 22 February 2002. The claimant council B commenced possession proceedings against respondent N after many years of adverse possession. N, resisting the application on the grounds that he claimed adverse possesion, argued that the claim was time-barred under Limitation Act 1980 s15 and Sched 1 and that the 'without prejudice' letter of 1988 proposing lease terms was inadmissible. Held that B was entitled to possession as N had failed to prove adverse possession.