Landlord and tenant - rent review
Series: Estates Gazette Case Summaries ; [2002] 12 EG 134 (CS)Publication details: 2002Subject(s): Summary: "First Property Growth Parnership LP v Royal & Sun Alliance Property Services Ltd", ChD 8 March 2002. Defendant tenant (R) occupied offices under a 35-year lease. The landlord acquired the reversion of the lease but R disputed the validity of the notice contending it had to be given no later than 6 May 2000. Notice was declared invalid despite there being no date specified in the lease as the last date upon which a notice could be served.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London News article | WB3812-20 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 117315-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: News article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
"First Property Growth Parnership LP v Royal & Sun Alliance Property Services Ltd", ChD 8 March 2002. Defendant tenant (R) occupied offices under a 35-year lease. The landlord acquired the reversion of the lease but R disputed the validity of the notice contending it had to be given no later than 6 May 2000. Notice was declared invalid despite there being no date specified in the lease as the last date upon which a notice could be served.