Indecent proposals
Series: Building ; 267(8229) 12 April 2002, 48-49(2)Publication details: 2002Subject(s): Summary: Looks at claims by unsuccessful parties to an adjudication to set-off the amount to be paid under the decision by sums owed to it by the successful party. Reviews "Robert McAlpine v Pring St Hill" (2001) where the contractor brought enforcement proceedings and in which the defendant subcontractor made a set-off claim. Highlights the subcontractor's argument on the requirements of the Housing Grants, Construction and Regeneration Act 1996.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal article | London Journal article | ABS65297 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 117651-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
Looks at claims by unsuccessful parties to an adjudication to set-off the amount to be paid under the decision by sums owed to it by the successful party. Reviews "Robert McAlpine v Pring St Hill" (2001) where the contractor brought enforcement proceedings and in which the defendant subcontractor made a set-off claim. Highlights the subcontractor's argument on the requirements of the Housing Grants, Construction and Regeneration Act 1996.