Judicial review
Series: Estates Gazette ; [2002] 20 EG 225 (CS) (18/5/02)Publication details: 2002Subject(s): Summary: "R (on the application of Barron) v Surrey CC", CA 7 May 2002. Appeal by B against the judge's decision refusing B permission to pursue judicial review proceedings challenging the legality of the respondent council's scheme to charge householders for deed recognising right of way. Appeal allowed on the grounds that the settlement of B's private law claim to a right of way did not prevent B from pursuing a public law claim as part of a group of householders.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London News article | WB3819-01 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 118084-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: News article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
"R (on the application of Barron) v Surrey CC", CA 7 May 2002. Appeal by B against the judge's decision refusing B permission to pursue judicial review proceedings challenging the legality of the respondent council's scheme to charge householders for deed recognising right of way. Appeal allowed on the grounds that the settlement of B's private law claim to a right of way did not prevent B from pursuing a public law claim as part of a group of householders.