Wiberg v Swansea City and CC
Series: Rating and Valuation Reporter ; [2002] RVR 143-146(4)Publication details: 2002Subject(s): Summary: LT 22 November 2001. Claimant (W) sought compensation for the compulsory acquisition of land that formed part of a storage yard and access area to premises. Issues arising were: was claim barred under Limitation Act 1980?; was defendant (SW) estopped from relying on provisions of the 1980 Act?; did a binding agreement subject to satisfactory title exist for the acquisition of the land. "Held" claim dismissed as statute barred and S not estopped from using limitation defence. Although a compensation agreement from 1995 existed S had never agreed to waive the limitation period and both parties had proceeded on the basis that the period applied.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | ABS65493 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 118139-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
LT 22 November 2001. Claimant (W) sought compensation for the compulsory acquisition of land that formed part of a storage yard and access area to premises. Issues arising were: was claim barred under Limitation Act 1980?; was defendant (SW) estopped from relying on provisions of the 1980 Act?; did a binding agreement subject to satisfactory title exist for the acquisition of the land. "Held" claim dismissed as statute barred and S not estopped from using limitation defence. Although a compensation agreement from 1995 existed S had never agreed to waive the limitation period and both parties had proceeded on the basis that the period applied.