Guidance on costs order
Series: RICS News Service ; 17 June 2002, (2)Publication details: 2002Subject(s): Summary: In considering Excelsior Commercial & Industrial Holdings Ltd v Salisbury Hamer Aspden & Johnson Betesh & Co, the Court of Appeal declined to offer guidance on costs order. Judges ruled that the circumstances in which a court may be concerned with costs and payments may vary considerably as an infinite variety of situations existed that might go to court justifying the making of a cost order.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| News article | London News article | WB3822-02 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 118441-1001 |
In considering Excelsior Commercial & Industrial Holdings Ltd v Salisbury Hamer Aspden & Johnson Betesh & Co, the Court of Appeal declined to offer guidance on costs order. Judges ruled that the circumstances in which a court may be concerned with costs and payments may vary considerably as an infinite variety of situations existed that might go to court justifying the making of a cost order.