Expert determination: challenging an expert determination
Series: Arbitration Law Monthly ; 2(5) May 2002, 7-11(5)Publication details: 2002Subject(s): Summary: Expert determination is often used to resolve valuation disputes. It is usual that an expert determination is capable of challenge in the courts in only two circumstances: the an expert has reached a conclusion that is so unreasonable that no reasonable expert could have reached that conclusion; or the expert has ignored his instructions in a material respect in reaching his decision. Examines these aspects of expert determination in two decisions of Thomas J, "Galaxy Energy International Ltd v Eurobunker SpA" (2001) and "Invensys plc v Automotive Sealing Systems Ltd" (2001) and a decision of the CA, "Veba Oil Supply and Trading GmbH v Petrotrade Inc" (2001)| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal article | London Journal article | ABS65598 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 118500-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
Expert determination is often used to resolve valuation disputes. It is usual that an expert determination is capable of challenge in the courts in only two circumstances: the an expert has reached a conclusion that is so unreasonable that no reasonable expert could have reached that conclusion; or the expert has ignored his instructions in a material respect in reaching his decision. Examines these aspects of expert determination in two decisions of Thomas J, "Galaxy Energy International Ltd v Eurobunker SpA" (2001) and "Invensys plc v Automotive Sealing Systems Ltd" (2001) and a decision of the CA, "Veba Oil Supply and Trading GmbH v Petrotrade Inc" (2001)