Putting an end to it all
Series: Building ; 267(8249) 6 September 2002, 50(1)Publication details: 2002Subject(s): Summary: Reviews the consequences of the CA decision in , "Rice v Great Yarmouth BC" ( CA [2003] TCLR 1)E It concerned whether a local authority GY was entitled to terminate two contracts it made with a horticultural contractor. GY had served many default notices under the contract which contained a clause allowing it to terminate the contractor's employment with immediate effect if any of the obligations were breached. The contractor admitted that a number of breaches had occurred, but surprisingly, CA agreed that the terminations were invalid.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Book | London Books | ABS65858 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 119673-1001 |
Reviews the consequences of the CA decision in , "Rice v Great Yarmouth BC" ( CA [2003] TCLR 1)E It concerned whether a local authority GY was entitled to terminate two contracts it made with a horticultural contractor. GY had served many default notices under the contract which contained a clause allowing it to terminate the contractor's employment with immediate effect if any of the obligations were breached. The contractor admitted that a number of breaches had occurred, but surprisingly, CA agreed that the terminations were invalid.