Aqua Design and Play International Ltd and another v Kier Ltd
Series: Construction Law Reports ; [2002] 82 Con LR 107-125(19)Publication details: 2002Subject(s): Summary: CA 14 May 2002. The appellant (K) sought to overturn an earlier ruling that DOM/1 cl32, which stated that a contractor is only obliged to pay subcontractors when paid by the employer, was not incorporated into the contract (see Abs64856 for discussion). "Held": the appeal was allowed on the grounds that it was clear that the agreement referred to the uncorrected version (See Abs66196).| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | X12140 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 121454-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
CA 14 May 2002. The appellant (K) sought to overturn an earlier ruling that DOM/1 cl32, which stated that a contractor is only obliged to pay subcontractors when paid by the employer, was not incorporated into the contract (see Abs64856 for discussion). "Held": the appeal was allowed on the grounds that it was clear that the agreement referred to the uncorrected version (See Abs66196).