Now you're talking
Series: Building ; 253(8274) 14 March 2003, 54-55(2)Publication details: 2003Subject(s): Summary: Comments on the CDM Regulations which the Health & Safety Executive has contemplated making changes to. Says how much the CDM has been criticised for introducing bureaucracy into the industry and being difficult to enforce and implement. Argues that when the CDM is reformed it should follow the good practice set down in the Construction Act 1996 which requires people to put certain terms into their construction contracts governing such items as payment and adjudication. This would give the parties the right to enforce the regulations contractually and also to sue for breach of statutory duty.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal article | London Journal article | ABS66493 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 121734-1001 |
Comments on the CDM Regulations which the Health & Safety Executive has contemplated making changes to. Says how much the CDM has been criticised for introducing bureaucracy into the industry and being difficult to enforce and implement. Argues that when the CDM is reformed it should follow the good practice set down in the Construction Act 1996 which requires people to put certain terms into their construction contracts governing such items as payment and adjudication. This would give the parties the right to enforce the regulations contractually and also to sue for breach of statutory duty.