Construction act review
Series: Construction Law Journal ; 19(6) 2003, 319-338(20)Publication details: 2003Subject(s):- HOUSING GRANTS, CONSTRUCTION AND REGENERATION ACT 1996 S108
- MANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION-ADJUDICATION
- NEGOTIATION
- HALKI SHIPPING CORPORATION V SOPEX OILS LTD
- FASTRACK CONTRACTORS LTD V MORRISON CONSTRUCTION
- SINDALL LTD V SOLLAND
- WATKIN JONES AND SON LTD V LIDL UK GMBH
- COSTAIN LTD V WESCOL STEEL LTD
- BECK PEPPIATT LTD V NORWEST HOLST CONSTRUCTION LTD
- ORANGE E B S LTD V A B B LTD
- MANGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION
| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal article | London Journal article | ABS67152 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 124182-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
Uses a variety of cases to illustrate the meaning of the word 'dispute' in the context of adjudication, for the purposes of s108 of the Housing Grants, Construction and Regeneration Act 1996. Examines the case law which has developed since the passing of the Act. Concludes that the adjudication process sometimes results in disputes being taken to adjudication rather than being resolved by negotiation.