A case of foot and mouth
Series: Building ; 268(8308) 14 November 2003, 62(1)Publication details: 2003Subject(s):- BUILT ENVIRONMENT-BUILDING CONTRACT FORMS
- MANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION-ADJUDICATION
- NORDOT ENGINEERING SERVICES LTD V SIEMANS PLC
- MANGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION
| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal article | London Journal article | ABS67330 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 124765-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
Advises parties involved in an adjudication dispute that, if they think an adjudicator has no right to decide a dispute, they should be careful what they say as they can lose the right to have the court overturn the result. It suggests parties should not submit to an adjudicator's jurisdictional decision,as they may not be able to appeal againstthe decision at a later date. This may be especially true in construction contracts.