What lawyers argue about
Language: English Series: Estates Gazette ; (0541) 15 October 2005, 203(1)Publication details: 2005Subject(s):- COMPULSORY PURCHASE ACT 1965 S10(1)
- HIGHWAYS ACT 1980
- HAMMERSMITH AND CITY RAILWAY COMPANY V BRAND
- WILDTREE HOTELS LTD AND OTHERS V HARROW LBC
- WILTSHIRE CC V CREST ESTATES LTD
- LAND COMPENSATION ACT 1973 S1(1)
- LAND CLAUSES CONSOLIDATION ACT 1845
- ENVIRONMENTAL AND LAND CONSULTANCY-PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT-COMPULSORY PURCHASE AND COMPENSATION
| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal article | London Journal article | L131343 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 131343-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
Discusses indemnity clauses in development agreements, commenting on "Wiltshire CC v Crest Estate Ltd" ([2005] EWCA Civ 1059, L131040) in which CA was divided over the meaning of an indemnity clause in an agreement between a highway authority and a residential property developer. Concludes that a developer's indemnity to a local authority covers claims in respect of a highway's construction but not its use.