The co-ordination of building services drawings
Language: English Series: Contract Journal ; 431(6551) 16 November 2005 37(1)Publication details: 2005Subject(s): Summary: Describes and comments upon "Emcor Drake and Scull Ltd v Edinburgh Royal Joint Venture and others" ([2005] ScotCS CSOH134, unreported), where a dispute arose over whether building services drawings described as fully co-ordinated and approved for construction were in fact ready for installation. It was decided that in this instance, there were two stages of drawing co-ordination and despite the use of the words fully co-ordinated, design installation input was still required from the specialist sub-contractor.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal article | London Journal article | L131628 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 131628-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
Describes and comments upon "Emcor Drake and Scull Ltd v Edinburgh Royal Joint Venture and others" ([2005] ScotCS CSOH134, unreported), where a dispute arose over whether building services drawings described as fully co-ordinated and approved for construction were in fact ready for installation. It was decided that in this instance, there were two stages of drawing co-ordination and despite the use of the words fully co-ordinated, design installation input was still required from the specialist sub-contractor.