A narrow decision
Series: Estates Gazette ; (0610) 11 March 2006, 150-151(2)Publication details: 2006Subject(s):- R V SOS ENVIRONMENT,TRANSPORT AND THE REGIONS EX P ALCONBURY DEVELOPERS LTD
- J A PYE (OXFORD) LTD V GRAHAM
- PYE (OXFORD) LTD & ANOR V UNITED KINGDOM
- WILSON V FIRST COUNTY TRUST LTD (NO. 2)
- R V OXFORDSHIRE CC AND ANOTHER EX P SUNNINGWELL PARISH COUNCIL
- OXFORDSHIRE CC V OXFORD CITY COUNCIL AND ANOTHER
- BEAULANE PROPERTIES LTD V PALMER
- PROPERTY-PROPERTY ACQUISITION AND DISPOSAL
| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal article | London Journal article | L132899 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 132899-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
Asks whether the "Pye v United Kingdom" ruling (L131742) which concerned the limited area of land registration has more far-reaching implications? Has it finished off the doctrine of adverse possession at least in respect of registered land? Concludes that the ruling is unlikely to open the floodgates of adverse possession cases but Convention rights are likely to play a continuing role in property law, especially where a person's enjoyment of possessions is disturbed by state intervention .