Possession orders
Language: English Series: Solicitors' Journal ; 150(10) 17 March 2006, 323-326(3)Publication details: 2006Subject(s): Summary: Considers the problems posed by the making of suspended possession orders in the light of the decision in "Ealing LBC v Richardson" ([2005] EWCA 1798, unreported) when the CA allowed the defendant to stay in her home despite having breached the terms of a suspended possession order made nine years earlier. Outlines a series of steps that can be taken to prevent this state of affairs, covering matters up to the making of a possession order, after an order has been made, and the situation if judgment is suspended.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal article | London Journal article | L132972 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 132972-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
Considers the problems posed by the making of suspended possession orders in the light of the decision in "Ealing LBC v Richardson" ([2005] EWCA 1798, unreported) when the CA allowed the defendant to stay in her home despite having breached the terms of a suspended possession order made nine years earlier. Outlines a series of steps that can be taken to prevent this state of affairs, covering matters up to the making of a possession order, after an order has been made, and the situation if judgment is suspended.