3M United Kingdom plc and another v Linklaters and Paines (a firm)
Language: English Publication details: 2006Subject(s): Online resources: Summary: [2006] EWCA Civ 530, 3 May 2006. Considers an appeal against an order made in ([2005] EWHC 1382 (Ch), (2005) NPC 87) concerning a breach of duty action brought against Linklaters law firm that was ruled out of time. Linklaters did not dispute that it failed to advise 3M of a loss in break rights on leases following 3M's corporate restructuring. "Held": Appeal dismissed. 3M had issued proceedings three years and two days after becoming aware of the mistake - the relevant statutory limitation period was three years. (See also L130486.)| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | Virtual Online | ONLINE PUBLICATION (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 133671-2001 |
Browsing Virtual shelves, Shelving location: Online Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
| No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | ||
| ONLINE PUBLICATION TTMI Ltd of England v ASM Shipping Ltd of India | ONLINE PUBLICATION Miller v Miller; McFarlane v McFarlane | ONLINE PUBLICATION Economics survey UK | ONLINE PUBLICATION 3M United Kingdom plc and another v Linklaters and Paines (a firm) | ONLINE PUBLICATION Barker v Corus (UK) plc Murray v British Shipbuilders (Hydrodynamics) Ltd and others Patterson v Smiths Dock Ltd and others | ONLINE PUBLICATION Glen Courtney v Corp Limited | ONLINE PUBLICATION Adealon International Proprietary Ltd v London Borough of Merton |
[2006] EWCA Civ 530, 3 May 2006. Considers an appeal against an order made in ([2005] EWHC 1382 (Ch), (2005) NPC 87) concerning a breach of duty action brought against Linklaters law firm that was ruled out of time. Linklaters did not dispute that it failed to advise 3M of a loss in break rights on leases following 3M's corporate restructuring. "Held": Appeal dismissed. 3M had issued proceedings three years and two days after becoming aware of the mistake - the relevant statutory limitation period was three years. (See also L130486.)