Lucille Nancy Sugarman v George Richard Porter and others
Language: English Publication details: 2006Subject(s): Online resources: Summary: [2006] EWHC 331 Ch, 8 March 2006. Declaration sought by S that P were not entitled to the benefit of covenants set out in a schedule to the conveyance of a property of which S was the freehold owner. "Held": declaration granted. The covenants had been intended to enable S's predecessor in title H to retain control as long as she was the owner of the land unsold. If a piece of land was sold the benefit of the covenant ceased to be annexed to that land unless expressly assigned. As all the land had been sold by H and there had been no express assignment, S was entitled to the declaration sought.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | Virtual Online | ONLINE PUBLICATION (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 133966-2001 |
Browsing Virtual shelves, Shelving location: Online Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
| No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | ||
| ONLINE PUBLICATION David Markinson v The Information Commissioner [electronic resource] | ONLINE PUBLICATION Andrew Logan v Scottish Water | ONLINE PUBLICATION Sharon Griffiths v St Helens Council | ONLINE PUBLICATION Lucille Nancy Sugarman v George Richard Porter and others | ONLINE PUBLICATION The Carphone Warehouse UK Ltd v Cyrus Malekout | ONLINE PUBLICATION Sandhu Menswear Company Ltd v Woolworths plc | ONLINE PUBLICATION R v Brighton and Hove City Council and Brighton and Hove Football Club ex p John Catt |
[2006] EWHC 331 Ch, 8 March 2006. Declaration sought by S that P were not entitled to the benefit of covenants set out in a schedule to the conveyance of a property of which S was the freehold owner. "Held": declaration granted. The covenants had been intended to enable S's predecessor in title H to retain control as long as she was the owner of the land unsold. If a piece of land was sold the benefit of the covenant ceased to be annexed to that land unless expressly assigned. As all the land had been sold by H and there had been no express assignment, S was entitled to the declaration sought.