CPO an issue for human rights law
Language: English Series: Estates Gazette ; (0625) 24 June 2006, 200-202(3)Publication details: 2006Subject(s):- CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND FUNDAMENTAL FREEDOMS FIRST PROTOCOL ART 1
- HUMAN RIGHTS ACT 1998
- COMPULSORY PURCHASE ACT 1965
- COMPULSORY PURCHASE (VESTING DECLARATIONS) ACT 1981
- PYE (OXFORD) LTD & ANOR V UNITED KINGDOM
- HILLINGDON LBC V ARC LTD
- CO-OPERATIVE WHOLESALE SOCIETY LTD V CHESTER-LE-STREET DC
- EUROPEAN
- ENVIRONMENTAL AND LAND CONSULTANCY-PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT-COMPULSORY PURCHASE AND COMPENSATION
| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal article | London Journal article | L133982 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 133982-1001 |
Discusses the compatibility of domestic UK law with the European Convention of Human Rights. Considers a judgment by the European Court of Human Rights, "Pye v UK" (ECHR, L131742), a case regarding a squatter's claim for possessory title. Looks at limitation in compulsory purchase and the cases of "Hillingdon London BC v Arc" (CA, Abs62992) and "Co-operative Wholesale Ltd v Chester-le-Street DC" (CA, Abs59282). Argues that there is no reason why limitation periods should apply in cases of compulsory acquisition.