Image from Google Jackets

CPO an issue for human rights law

By: Language: English Series: Estates Gazette ; (0625) 24 June 2006, 200-202(3)Publication details: 2006Subject(s): Summary: Discusses the compatibility of domestic UK law with the European Convention of Human Rights. Considers a judgment by the European Court of Human Rights, "Pye v UK" (ECHR, L131742), a case regarding a squatter's claim for possessory title. Looks at limitation in compulsory purchase and the cases of "Hillingdon London BC v Arc" (CA, Abs62992) and "Co-operative Wholesale Ltd v Chester-le-Street DC" (CA, Abs59282). Argues that there is no reason why limitation periods should apply in cases of compulsory acquisition.
Holdings
Item type Current library Call number Copy number Status Barcode
Journal article London Journal article L133982 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) 1 Available 133982-1001

Discusses the compatibility of domestic UK law with the European Convention of Human Rights. Considers a judgment by the European Court of Human Rights, "Pye v UK" (ECHR, L131742), a case regarding a squatter's claim for possessory title. Looks at limitation in compulsory purchase and the cases of "Hillingdon London BC v Arc" (CA, Abs62992) and "Co-operative Wholesale Ltd v Chester-le-Street DC" (CA, Abs59282). Argues that there is no reason why limitation periods should apply in cases of compulsory acquisition.