Oral contracts
Language: English Series: Contract Journal ; 434(6589) 23 August 2006, 20(1)Publication details: 2006Subject(s): Summary: Comments upon "Maggs v Marsh" ([2006] EWCA Civ 1058, L134669). The decision emphasises that whereas subsequent conduct cannot be taken into account in interpreting the terms of a written contract, it is perfectly permissible to use such evidence where the contract is wholly or partly oral.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal article | London Journal article | L134672 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 134672-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
Comments upon "Maggs v Marsh" ([2006] EWCA Civ 1058, L134669). The decision emphasises that whereas subsequent conduct cannot be taken into account in interpreting the terms of a written contract, it is perfectly permissible to use such evidence where the contract is wholly or partly oral.