Image from Google Jackets

Fuller v SoS for the Environment and Another

Language: English Series: Estates Gazette ; (8801) 9 January 1988, 55-56(2)Publication details: 1988Subject(s): Summary: CA 23 September 1987. Application for leave to appeal from a decision dismissing an appeal from a decision of the SoS Environment upholding enforcement notices served on the applicant alleging a material change of use of farmland . (For the facts of this case see Abstract 38097). The present issue centred on the position created by storage of grain produced on the applicant`s land, and stored on two of his farms, but not intended for feeding livestock at the farms. The planning authority and the SoS Environment had both treated the applicants` holding as being divided into separate planning units, and concluded that storage of grain from other parts of the holding on the planning unit under consideration for purposes unconnected with agriculture, was a use for storage in itself, not a use for agriculture. Previous decision had upheld this ruling. Leave to appeal was refused; observations on planning unit in South Staffordshire District Council v Secretary of State for the Environment
Holdings
Item type Current library Call number Copy number Status Barcode
Law report London Journal article ABS38726 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) 1 Available 12163-1001

CA 23 September 1987. Application for leave to appeal from a decision dismissing an appeal from a decision of the SoS Environment upholding enforcement notices served on the applicant alleging a material change of use of farmland . (For the facts of this case see Abstract 38097). The present issue centred on the position created by storage of grain produced on the applicant`s land, and stored on two of his farms, but not intended for feeding livestock at the farms. The planning authority and the SoS Environment had both treated the applicants` holding as being divided into separate planning units, and concluded that storage of grain from other parts of the holding on the planning unit under consideration for purposes unconnected with agriculture, was a use for storage in itself, not a use for agriculture. Previous decision had upheld this ruling. Leave to appeal was refused; observations on planning unit in South Staffordshire District Council v Secretary of State for the Environment