W G Mitchell (Gleneagles) Ltd and another v Jemstock One Ltd
Language: English Series: Commercial Leases ; 20(10) November/December 2006 1174(1)Publication details: 2006Subject(s): Summary: [2006] LTL 10/10/2006. The claimant who had entered into an agreement for lease of a premises with the defendant sought rectification of the agreement on the basis of it omitting key provisions which had been agreed between the parties as to guarantee payments of any shortfall between a minimum rent and the rent payable. "Held": the judge ruled that the evidence that agreed provisions had been omitted from the agreement for lease by mistake.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal article | London Journal article | L136039 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 136039-1001 |
[2006] LTL 10/10/2006. The claimant who had entered into an agreement for lease of a premises with the defendant sought rectification of the agreement on the basis of it omitting key provisions which had been agreed between the parties as to guarantee payments of any shortfall between a minimum rent and the rent payable. "Held": the judge ruled that the evidence that agreed provisions had been omitted from the agreement for lease by mistake.