Law briefing compulsory purchase and compensation update 2007
Language: English Series: Journal of Property Investment and Finance ; 25(4) 2007, 410-415(2)Publication details: 2007Subject(s):- CROWLEY AND ANOTHER V LIVERPOOL PSDA AND ANOTHER
- MOTO HOSPITALITY LTD V HIGHWAYS AGENCY
- DIRECTOR OF BUILDINGS AND LANDS V SHUN FUNG IRONWORKS LTD
- BEDE DISTRIBUTORS LTD V NEWCASTLE UPON TYNE CORPORATION
- KWIK SAVE STORES LTD V STOCKTON ON TEES BC
- OPTICAL EXPRESS (SOUTHERN) LTD V BIRMINGHAM CITY COUNCIL
- METROPOLITAN BOARD OF WORKS V MCCARTHY
- JOLIFFE V EXETER CORPORATION
- BENJAMIN V STORR
- CALEDONIAN RAILWAY CO V WALKER'S TRUSTEES
- COMPULSORY PURCHASE ACT 1965 S10
- England and Wales -- 1543-
- ENVIRONMENTAL AND LAND CONSULTANCY-PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT-COMPULSORY PURCHASE AND COMPENSATION
| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal article | London Journal article | L140083 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 140083-1001 |
Reviews two key compensation cases of the last 12 months. "Crowley and Jarvis v Liverpool PSDA Ltd and Liverpool City Council" ([2007] EWLands ACQ/47/2005, L138709) deals with all aspects of a disturbance claim, including backing a method to assessing compensation for goodwill which questions the traditional method, preferred by the tribunal for time immemorial. "Moto Hospitality Ltd v Highways Agency" ([2006] EWLands LCA/122/2005) is an unusual example of a successful claim under the Compulsory Purchase Act 1965 s10, culminating in a substantial entitlement to compensation.