The path to equity
Language: English Series: Estates Gazette ; (0821) 31 May 2008, 130-132(3)Publication details: 2008Subject(s):- EYESTORM LTD V HOPTONACRE HOMES LTD
- LAW OF PROPERTY (MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS) ACT 1989
- MCCAUSLAND V DUNCAN LAWRIE LTD
- COMMISSION FOR THE NEW TOWNS V TERRACE HILL (STOCKTON) LTD
- ANDERSON ANTIQUES (UK) LTD V ANDERSON WHARF (HULL) LTD AND AKRILL
- LAND REGISTRATION ACT 2002 S77
- COBBE V YEOMAN'S ROW MANAGEMENT LTD
- HOPPER V HOPPER
- England and Wales -- 1543-
- PROPERTY-PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT
| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal article | London Journal article | L143878 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 143878-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
Discusses the application of the legal principle of estoppel to commercial property deals. Notes that this is being used increasingly as a means of redress when commercial deals are reneged upon. Notes that promissory estoppel cannot be claimed in order to create a new cause of action. Similarly, estoppel by convention has yet to be shown to be relevant in such cases. Shows that proprietary estoppel can be used in certain circumstances. Case law.