Qualified success
Language: English Series: Estates Gazette ; (0913) 4 April 2009, 134-136(3)Publication details: 2009Subject(s):- NAILRILE LTD V EARL CADOGAN
- HOWARD DE WALDEN ESTATES LTD V AGGIO AND ORS
- MCGUCKIAN'S APPEAL, RE
- EARL CADOGAN AND ANOTHER V SPORTELLI AND ANOTHER
- LEASEHOLD REFORM, HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT ACT 1993 S2
- England and Wales -- 1543-
- PROPERTY-LANDLORD AND TENANT-LEASES-LEASEHOLD ENFRANCHISEMENT
- PROPERTY-COMMERCIAL PROPERTY-COMMERCIAL PROPERTY MARKET
| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal article | London Journal article | L147181 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 147181-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
Explains that residential headleases have become more important in recent collective leasehold enfranchisement cases. Focuses on the House of Lords ruling in Howard de Walden Estates Ltd v Aggio, on whether a flat occupied by the head lessee could be subject to a collective enfranchisement claim under the Leasehold Reform, Housing and Urban Development Act 1993 S2, and the Lands Tribunal decision in Nailrile Ltd v Earl Cadogan, on the valuation of intermediate leases. Argues that although some issues have been resolved, others have not.