Associated agreements need clarity
Language: English Series: Property Week ; 75(39) 25 September 2009, 86-87(2)Publication details: 2009Subject(s): Summary: HC had to determine in Mount Anvil Group and others v Volans Management and Lupus Associates, HC, 30 July 2009, whether a contract to purchase commercial property in London had ended because of the termination of associated agreements. M had three agreements with V for one transaction but rescinded one agreement when L failed to make a payment. Held: M had rescinded all three agreements having rescinded one agreement with L.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal article | London Journal article | L148545 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 148545-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
HC had to determine in Mount Anvil Group and others v Volans Management and Lupus Associates, HC, 30 July 2009, whether a contract to purchase commercial property in London had ended because of the termination of associated agreements. M had three agreements with V for one transaction but rescinded one agreement when L failed to make a payment. Held: M had rescinded all three agreements having rescinded one agreement with L.